On Nouveau

Nouveau (now posting as "Authentic Nouveau"), is a poster on CARM. His posts are barely coherent, but he frequently likes to pretend that Darwin was racist and that Hitler based his ideas on Darwinism.

Here is a recent sample (from here, but note that CARM frequently delete old threads, so the link may not work in a few months).

Nazis love to claim Hitler was a Christian.

KKK were of the same Devil that Atheeists obey.

Can you name the documented liar who lies time and again about Ananias and saphira?

Lastly, Atheeists in their pride of dishonesty can't quote The Lord Jesus Christ who defines HIS kingdom

Satan doesn't give you permission to quote the Bible correctly. You also are not given permission to accuse Stalin and misc other brutal and wicked atheeist ring leaders.

I addressed the lie that Darwin was racist here.

I have addressed the lie that Hitler used Darwinism here.

More recently, I also made a post pointing out these claims are more true of Christianity, than Darwinism - that Christianity has a long history of racism, that the slaver owners in the US were Christianity and further more used Christianity to support their views, that the KKK was a Christian organisation, that the Nazis were Christian and that Hitler revered Martin Luther, founder of Protestantism.

I have responded to Nouveau numerous times pointing this out. I have no hope of convincing him, I know that, but at least I can highlight that Christianity is so much worse than Darwinism, and the hope is that this may make at least a few people think about the lies he is peddling.

Especially as Nouveau so rarely supports his claims with any kind of evidence.

Nouveau is an "interesting" character as he makes various fanciful claims. He has not been so outrageous recently, but in the past he has claimed to be a medical doctor, to be the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, to have a daughter who is an Olympic athlete, and to be the president of his local yacht club.

Of course, none of it true.

How do I know this? Well, for one thing his posts are barely coherent. How can someone so incoherent get to be a doctor or CEO?

However, with respect to his claim to be a doctor, we can be utterly certain he is lying, because three years ago he made a post confusing midi-clorians (the things from Star Wars) and mitachondria (the things in cells that any real doctor would know about).

Fortunately I got a screen shot, to preserve his ignorance for posterity.


Nouveau is a fantasist. He lives in a made-up world when he is a brilliant doctor and successful businessman. And where Christianity is true.

The reality is quite different.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Southern Baptist Convention Position on Abortion

Evangelical Christians in the US are very strongly anti-abortion. However, it was not always so. As recently as 1970 the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) - the largest Protestant denomination in the US - advocated for legalising abortion. A Complete Reversal The landmark law case in the US was Roe v. Wade, in 1973, and abortion has been legal since that time. Jane Roe was the pseudonym of the woman wanting the abortion; Henry Wade the district attorney who stood for the state, prohibiting it. Roe was represented by two attorneys; one was Linda Coffee, a member of the SBC. The Baptist Press interviewed her after the successful conclusion of the trial. The decision of Roe v Wade was generally regarded as a good one by the SBC. To evangelicals of that time abortion was seen as a Catholic issue. You can find a list of abortion-related resolutions made by the SBC from 1971 onwards  here . It is clear that in 1971 they saw abortion - quite reasonably - as undesirable, but it ...
Read more

Hinman's "Argument From Transcendental Signifier"

ETA (23/Jun/20): I have just heard Joe is in hospital. I wish him a speedy recovery. All the best, Joe. This is an argument for God that Joe Hinman has presented several times on various of his sites: http://www.doxa.ws/Ontological/TS2.html https://christiancadre.blogspot.com/2020/05/transcendental-signifier-argument.html http://religiousapriori.blogspot.com/2011/06/transcendental-signifier-argument.html http://metacrock.blogspot.com/2018/01/premises-4-7-ts-argumet.html The argument is a seven step syllogism: 1. Any rational, coherent, and meaningful view of the universe must of necessity presuppose organizing principles (Ops) 2. OP's summed up in TS 3. Modern Thought rejects TS outright or takes out all aspects of mind. 4. Therefore, Modern thought fails to provide a rational, coherent, and meaningful view of the universe. 5. minds organize and communicate meaning 6. Therefore universal mind, offers the best understanding of TS 7. Concept of God unites TS with universal m...
Read more

Kent Hovind: Third wife in three years?

Kent Hovind is, perhaps the very worst of the creationists, so it is with some interest I note that he is now on this third wife in three years. For many years he was married to Jo Hovind, who ended up going to prison for a year due to her involvement in tax fraud. Once Kent got released from his rather longer prison sentence, it was not long before Jo filed for divorce (early 2016) - possibly to distance himself from any further gaol sentences. A few months later, 24th Sptember 2016, and he married Mary Tocco - not a full marriage, but a covenant before God. It looks like she got various assurances that Kent's new business was entirely honest before she got married. However, she later cam to realise that that was not really the case, and, again to avoid ending up in prison , she left him in November 2017. http://kehvrlb.com/mary-tocco-on-leaving-kent-hovind Less than a year later and he has a new wife, Cindi Lincoln, a former friend of Mary's. It is not clear if they ...
Read more